Tens of millions of dead people aren’t getting Social Security checks, despite Trump and Musk claims
elon and trump 3

Tens of millions of dead people aren’t getting Social Security checks, despite Trump and Musk claims


Share this post

The Trump administration is making false claims that millions of dead people over 100 years old are still getting Social Security payments.

Recently, both President Donald Trump and billionaire adviser Elon Musk have shared on social media and in press conferences that people aged 100, 200, or even 300 years old are improperly collecting benefits. Musk even called it a "HUGE problem" as his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) digs into federal agencies to fight waste, fraud, and abuse.

While it’s true that some improper payments have been made, including to deceased individuals, the numbers being thrown around by Musk and the White House are exaggerated and misrepresent the actual Social Security data. Here’s the real story:

What did the Trump administration say about payments to centenarians?

On Tuesday, Trump claimed in a press briefing that “we have millions and millions of people over 100 years old” receiving Social Security benefits. He called it “obviously fraudulent or incompetent” and added that removing these people from the system would make Social Security “very powerful.” He even mentioned someone listed as 360 years old.

Musk later posted on his platform X, joking about vampires collecting Social Security and pointing out that “tens of millions” of people marked as alive when they’re actually dead is a “HUGE problem.” He suggested some of these people would have been alive before America even existed.

How big of a problem is Social Security fraud?

According to a July 2024 report from Social Security’s inspector general, from 2015 to 2022, the agency paid out almost $8.6 trillion in benefits. Of that, about $71.8 billion — less than 1% — was in improper payments. The bulk of those were overpayments to living people.

In January, the U.S. Treasury also reclaimed over $31 million in federal payments (not just Social Security) that went to deceased individuals. This was part of a pilot program after Congress allowed the Treasury temporary access to Social Security’s “Full Death Master File,” which includes records going back to 1899. The Treasury estimates it will recover over $215 million over three years with this access.

So are tens of millions of people over 100 years old receiving benefits?

No, they are not.

The confusion comes from Social Security’s outdated software system, COBOL, which has trouble handling missing or incomplete birthdates. As a result, some records default to dates that are over 150 years old. This issue was first reported by WIRED.

In addition, reports from the Social Security Administration’s inspector general in 2023 and 2024 confirmed that around 18.9 million Social Security numbers belong to people born in 1920 or earlier but were not marked as deceased in the system. However, this doesn’t mean these individuals are receiving benefits.

The agency has chosen not to update the database due to the high cost — around $9 million. A 2023 report from the Social Security OIG noted that “almost none” of the people mentioned in the report are currently receiving payments. Plus, as of September 2015, payments automatically stop once someone hits 115 years old.


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
Trump’s 2024 Win: A Slow Growing Economy

Trump’s 2024 Win: A Slow Growing Economy

The 2024 U.S. presidential election ended with Donald Trump returning to the White House after a tense, stop‑start campaign and a closer‑than‑expected election night map. Networks called the race only after key Midwestern and Sun Belt states finished counting late‑arriving and provisional ballots, turning what had looked like a narrow path into a clear Electoral College win for the former president. The result immediately reset the 2025 political calendar. Trump’s second administration arrived


B P

Bad Bunny On Course To Be Fastest Artist Ever To Reach A Billion Revenue

Bad Bunny On Course To Be Fastest Artist Ever To Reach A Billion Revenue

Bad Bunny’s ascent into rarefied touring territory is no longer a projection. It is a documented reality.  On January 6, touring analytics account @TouringData posted a stark snapshot of the Puerto Rican superstar’s live dominance, writing, “Bad Bunny’s lifetime revenue has now surpassed $900 million from 5.7 million tickets sold since 2018. He is expected to become the fastest artist in history to reach $1 billion in the coming months.” Bad Bunny's lifetime revenue has now surpassed $900 mill


O A

Labubu, Moo Deng, and the New Life of Mascots Online

Labubu, Moo Deng, and the New Life of Mascots Online

Labubu and Moo Deng do not obviously belong together, but they end up in the same place: keeping people watching. One is a sharp‑toothed designer toy from Pop Mart’s blind box machines, the other is a baby pygmy hippo at a Thai zoo whose bath videos travel across feeds in minutes. They sit in different corners of the world—Chinese collectibles and a local animal attraction—but live in the same part of the internet, where niche interests become global habits very quickly. Mascots used to stay on


B P

Bruno Mars Announces New Album — First Solo Project in a Decade

Bruno Mars Announces New Album — First Solo Project in a Decade

Peter Gene Hernandez, the American singer popularly known as Bruno Mars, has announced the completion of his fourth studio album. The 40-year-old global superstar broke the news on social media on Monday with a simple and short post that read: “My album is done”. However, the album’s title, tracklist, and release date remain unknown. My album is done. — Bruno Mars (@BrunoMars) January 5, 2026 The announcement marks Mars’s first solo album since the monumental success of his third studio pr


O A