Tens of millions of dead people aren’t getting Social Security checks, despite Trump and Musk claims
elon and trump 3

Tens of millions of dead people aren’t getting Social Security checks, despite Trump and Musk claims


Share this post

The Trump administration is making false claims that millions of dead people over 100 years old are still getting Social Security payments.

Recently, both President Donald Trump and billionaire adviser Elon Musk have shared on social media and in press conferences that people aged 100, 200, or even 300 years old are improperly collecting benefits. Musk even called it a "HUGE problem" as his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) digs into federal agencies to fight waste, fraud, and abuse.

While it’s true that some improper payments have been made, including to deceased individuals, the numbers being thrown around by Musk and the White House are exaggerated and misrepresent the actual Social Security data. Here’s the real story:

What did the Trump administration say about payments to centenarians?

On Tuesday, Trump claimed in a press briefing that “we have millions and millions of people over 100 years old” receiving Social Security benefits. He called it “obviously fraudulent or incompetent” and added that removing these people from the system would make Social Security “very powerful.” He even mentioned someone listed as 360 years old.

Musk later posted on his platform X, joking about vampires collecting Social Security and pointing out that “tens of millions” of people marked as alive when they’re actually dead is a “HUGE problem.” He suggested some of these people would have been alive before America even existed.

How big of a problem is Social Security fraud?

According to a July 2024 report from Social Security’s inspector general, from 2015 to 2022, the agency paid out almost $8.6 trillion in benefits. Of that, about $71.8 billion — less than 1% — was in improper payments. The bulk of those were overpayments to living people.

In January, the U.S. Treasury also reclaimed over $31 million in federal payments (not just Social Security) that went to deceased individuals. This was part of a pilot program after Congress allowed the Treasury temporary access to Social Security’s “Full Death Master File,” which includes records going back to 1899. The Treasury estimates it will recover over $215 million over three years with this access.

So are tens of millions of people over 100 years old receiving benefits?

No, they are not.

The confusion comes from Social Security’s outdated software system, COBOL, which has trouble handling missing or incomplete birthdates. As a result, some records default to dates that are over 150 years old. This issue was first reported by WIRED.

In addition, reports from the Social Security Administration’s inspector general in 2023 and 2024 confirmed that around 18.9 million Social Security numbers belong to people born in 1920 or earlier but were not marked as deceased in the system. However, this doesn’t mean these individuals are receiving benefits.

The agency has chosen not to update the database due to the high cost — around $9 million. A 2023 report from the Social Security OIG noted that “almost none” of the people mentioned in the report are currently receiving payments. Plus, as of September 2015, payments automatically stop once someone hits 115 years old.


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
Charlie Puth Just Gave a Reminder of How the National Anthem Should Be Sung

Charlie Puth Just Gave a Reminder of How the National Anthem Should Be Sung

The national anthem has become a strange battleground in modern pop culture. Every performance seems to fall into one of two traps: either it’s overstuffed with vocal gymnastics meant to go viral, or it’s delivered so cautiously that it barely leaves a mark. Charlie Puth’s recent rendition cut cleanly through both extremes—and in doing so, quietly set a new bar. Puth didn’t treat the anthem like a flex. He treated it like a song. That alone made his performance stand out. From the first note,


Elliot O

Super Bowl LX by the Numbers: Seahawks vs Patriots — Who Has the Edge?

Super Bowl LX by the Numbers: Seahawks vs Patriots — Who Has the Edge?

The Super Bowl LX showdown between the Seattle Seahawks and the New England Patriots is officially a week away! So which team do the numbers favour? Super Bowl LX is scheduled for February 8th at Levi's Stadium, home of the San Francisco 49ers, at 6:30 p.m. Eastern (00:30 CET - Monday).  A new champion will be crowned Tonight.#AfroBallers #NFL #SBLX pic.twitter.com/IHAxkhjJhG — AfroBallers (@afroballers) February 8, 2026 Seahawks numbers Seattle has a chance to make NFL history on multiple


O A

Djokovic and Alcaraz Set for Australian Open Final

Djokovic and Alcaraz Set for Australian Open Final

Novak Djokovic and Carlos Alcaraz are set to meet in the Australian Open men’s final, creating another generational showdown at one of tennis’s biggest stages. A win for Alcaraz would complete the career Grand Slam at a remarkably young age, adding Melbourne to his titles at the other three majors, while Djokovic is chasing an all‑time record 25th major and yet another trophy on Rod Laver Arena. Broadcasters and news outlets have framed the clash as a historic moment, with the matchup highlighte


B P

Quantum, Space Internet, and “AI in the Real World” Set the Stage for 2026 Tech

Quantum, Space Internet, and “AI in the Real World” Set the Stage for 2026 Tech

The next wave of tech hype is less about new apps on your phone and more about the pipes underneath them, with experts pointing to advances in quantum computing, space‑based internet and AI that can understand the real world in a forward‑looking brief on four trends that will shape 2026. Scientists are working on more stable kinds of quantum bits that can hold fragile information for longer, a step toward machines that could crack problems today’s computers would need centuries to solve. At the


B P