Black Student Enrollment at Harvard Law Drops by HALF  After Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action
#image_title

Black Student Enrollment at Harvard Law Drops by HALF After Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action


Share this post

Black student enrollment at Harvard Law School has significantly decreased following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2023 decision to reject race-based admissions. The ruling deemed the consideration of race in college admissions a violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

The New York Times reported on Monday that Harvard Law School's incoming class includes only 19 Black students, representing 3.4% of the class — the lowest figure since the 1960s. This marks a steep decline from the 43 Black students who enrolled in the first-year class the previous year, according to data from the American Bar Association.

In response, Jeff Neal, a spokesperson for Harvard Law, reaffirmed the institution's commitment to diversity. "Harvard Law School continues to believe that a student body composed of persons with a wide variety of backgrounds and experiences is a vital component of legal education," Neal said in a statement to The Times. He added that the law school is dedicated to both complying with the Supreme Court's decision and fostering a diverse community.

Neal also emphasized the difficulty of drawing conclusions from a single year of data, telling Fox News Digital that the full impact of the Supreme Court's decision remains uncertain. "It was understood that the decision would impact, in ways that could not be fully anticipated, the ability of educational institutions across the nation to attract and admit a diverse cohort of students," he said.

However, not all at Harvard share this cautious optimism. Harvard Law Professor David B. Wilkins, an expert on Black representation in the legal profession, described the drop in Black enrollment as unprecedented. "This obviously has a lot to do with the chilling effect created by that decision. This is the lowest number of Black entering first-year students since 1965," Wilkins said. He noted that prior to 1965, Harvard Law admitted just 15 Black students, but since 1970, the first-year class has typically included 50 to 70 Black students.

Faculty members have also observed a decline in Black male students, with only six enrolling in the current first-year class. Sean Wynn, president of the Harvard Black Law Students Association, described the enrollment decline as a "crushing loss" and argued that the ruling has fundamentally altered the experience of attending Harvard Law School.

The decrease in Black enrollment is not the only significant racial impact of the Supreme Court’s decision. The New York Times reported that Hispanic enrollment at Harvard Law also fell sharply, from 11% (63 students) in 2023 to 6.9% (39 students) in 2024. Conversely, enrollment of white and Asian students increased.

Despite the decline at Harvard, some experts see broader positive trends. UCLA Law Professor Richard Sander, a critic of affirmative action, highlighted a 3% increase in the overall number of Black law students nationwide, rising from 2,969 in 2023 to 3,060 in 2024. Sander noted, however, that this increase might be influenced by changes in reporting practices, and the data does not account for multiracial students or those who declined to report their race.

Sander also suggested that the decline in Black enrollment at elite institutions like Harvard might be beneficial for some students. "Those students are going to go to another school where they’re better matched and they’re poised to succeed," he argued.

As the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling continue to unfold, institutions like Harvard Law face the challenge of maintaining diversity within the constraints of the new legal landscape. The broader impact on legal education and the profession remains to be seen.


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
How will the UK under 16s ban on social media work?

How will the UK under 16s ban on social media work?

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he would impose a ban on social media sites for children under 16 and restrictions on gaming and livestreaming platforms to "give kids their childhood back". Below are details of what is being ‌banned, how the measures will be enforced, and when they are expected to take effect: TIKTOK, YOUTUBE AND INSTAGRAM BANNED The government said it would block children using social media platforms whose purpose is to enable user-to-user social interaction and  wh


O A

Serena Williams set to partner with Karolina Muchova for Berlin doubles

Serena Williams set to partner with Karolina Muchova for Berlin doubles

US tennis great Serena Williams, on the comeback trail nearly four years after retiring, will partner Czech Karolina Muchova in the doubles at next week's Berlin Open grass court tournament. "We're going to play doubles. I'm pretty excited about it. "It doesn't happen every day that such an amazing athlete, not only in tennis but overall in sports, asks you to play tennis with her. I hope it's going to be fun," Muchova told a press conference in Berlin on Saturday. Williams, a 23-time Grand S


O A

UK announces sweeping social media ban for under-16s

UK announces sweeping social media ban for under-16s

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Monday he would ban social media sites for under-16s and impose restrictions on gaming and live-streaming ‌platforms, in a fightback against big tech that goes further than any other country. The sweeping changes will "give kids their childhood back", Starmer told reporters, outlining measures against Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram and other platforms, as well as gaming sites that allow strangers to contact children. "It is clear to me a full ban is the


O A

Fox set to buy Roku in $22 billion deal

Fox set to buy Roku in $22 billion deal

Fox signed an agreement to acquire Roku in a ‌deal valued at about $22 billion, the companies said. Roku is one of the first companies to bring streaming platforms like ⁠Netflix and YouTube to television through connected devices and smart TVs. Its business is largely driven by advertising and subscription revenue from streaming apps on its platform. Advertising is the largest component, ‌with ⁠revenue of $613 million in the first quarter, up 27% year-on-year. Fox will acquire Roku for $160 p


O A