Black Student Enrollment at Harvard Law Drops by HALF  After Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action
#image_title

Black Student Enrollment at Harvard Law Drops by HALF After Supreme Court Ruling on Affirmative Action


Share this post

Black student enrollment at Harvard Law School has significantly decreased following the U.S. Supreme Court's 2023 decision to reject race-based admissions. The ruling deemed the consideration of race in college admissions a violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

The New York Times reported on Monday that Harvard Law School's incoming class includes only 19 Black students, representing 3.4% of the class — the lowest figure since the 1960s. This marks a steep decline from the 43 Black students who enrolled in the first-year class the previous year, according to data from the American Bar Association.

In response, Jeff Neal, a spokesperson for Harvard Law, reaffirmed the institution's commitment to diversity. "Harvard Law School continues to believe that a student body composed of persons with a wide variety of backgrounds and experiences is a vital component of legal education," Neal said in a statement to The Times. He added that the law school is dedicated to both complying with the Supreme Court's decision and fostering a diverse community.

Neal also emphasized the difficulty of drawing conclusions from a single year of data, telling Fox News Digital that the full impact of the Supreme Court's decision remains uncertain. "It was understood that the decision would impact, in ways that could not be fully anticipated, the ability of educational institutions across the nation to attract and admit a diverse cohort of students," he said.

However, not all at Harvard share this cautious optimism. Harvard Law Professor David B. Wilkins, an expert on Black representation in the legal profession, described the drop in Black enrollment as unprecedented. "This obviously has a lot to do with the chilling effect created by that decision. This is the lowest number of Black entering first-year students since 1965," Wilkins said. He noted that prior to 1965, Harvard Law admitted just 15 Black students, but since 1970, the first-year class has typically included 50 to 70 Black students.

Faculty members have also observed a decline in Black male students, with only six enrolling in the current first-year class. Sean Wynn, president of the Harvard Black Law Students Association, described the enrollment decline as a "crushing loss" and argued that the ruling has fundamentally altered the experience of attending Harvard Law School.

The decrease in Black enrollment is not the only significant racial impact of the Supreme Court’s decision. The New York Times reported that Hispanic enrollment at Harvard Law also fell sharply, from 11% (63 students) in 2023 to 6.9% (39 students) in 2024. Conversely, enrollment of white and Asian students increased.

Despite the decline at Harvard, some experts see broader positive trends. UCLA Law Professor Richard Sander, a critic of affirmative action, highlighted a 3% increase in the overall number of Black law students nationwide, rising from 2,969 in 2023 to 3,060 in 2024. Sander noted, however, that this increase might be influenced by changes in reporting practices, and the data does not account for multiracial students or those who declined to report their race.

Sander also suggested that the decline in Black enrollment at elite institutions like Harvard might be beneficial for some students. "Those students are going to go to another school where they’re better matched and they’re poised to succeed," he argued.

As the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling continue to unfold, institutions like Harvard Law face the challenge of maintaining diversity within the constraints of the new legal landscape. The broader impact on legal education and the profession remains to be seen.


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
Cardi B and Stefon Diggs Spark Split Rumors

Cardi B and Stefon Diggs Spark Split Rumors

Cardi B and NFL wide receiver Stefon Diggs have sparked breakup speculation after fans noticed they no longer follow each other on Instagram in the wake of Super Bowl LX. The social media change came shortly after Diggs’ New England Patriots lost to the Seattle Seahawks, a game where both stars were reportedly in the area but were not photographed together. @espn (📺 NBC) #espnsocial #nfl #football #superbowl ♬ i was only temporary - my head is empty Entertainment outlets note that the pair


B P

Antonelli suffers car crash ahead of first pre-season test

Antonelli suffers car crash ahead of first pre-season test

Mercedes driver Kimi Antonelli was involved in a car cash close to his home in San Marino ahead of this weekend’s Formula 1 pre-season test in Bahrain. The 19-year-old was however unharmed in the incident which happened over the weekend and will be able to take part in the first test at the Bahrain International Circuit. Mercedes in a statement said: “We can confirm that Kimi was involved in a traffic accident on Saturday night close to his home in San Marino. “The police attended the scene,


O A

Ukraine Shifts From Drone Buyer to Drone Exporter

Ukraine Shifts From Drone Buyer to Drone Exporter

Ukraine is preparing to open 10 weapons export centers across Europe and begin production of Ukrainian‑designed drones in Germany, marking a shift from wartime arms recipient to emerging arms exporter. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told students at the Kyiv Aviation Institute that the export hubs—planned for 2026 across the Baltic and Northern European states—will sell systems built with Ukrainian technology, with German production to start in mid‑February and lines already running in the UK. A


B P

New Science Books Argue That Art, the Internet, and Weight‑Loss Drugs Are Quietly Rewiring Our Lives

New Science Books Argue That Art, the Internet, and Weight‑Loss Drugs Are Quietly Rewiring Our Lives

February’s batch of popular science books leans into big‑picture questions about the universe, the climate and our own bodies, framed as winter‑reading picks in New Scientist’s roundup of the month’s best new titles. Space scientist Maggie Aderin’s memoir “Starchild” anchors the list, weaving her work on satellites and the moon together with the story of raising a daughter and finding wonder in the night sky. Set against January’s offerings, where Daisy Fancourt’s “Art Cure” argued that concert


B P