Apple Pulls Key iPhone Security Feature Amid UK Government Pressure
#image_title

Apple Pulls Key iPhone Security Feature Amid UK Government Pressure


Share this post

Apple has removed security features from iPhones in the UK, in response to demands from the government to be given access to user data.

The tech giant is removing its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) system, which encrypts user files uploaded to the cloud.

It comes after reports that the British government issued Apple with a order under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 to provide “back door” access to its devices, which would allow intelligence agencies to spy on users.

Neither Apple nor the Home Office has confirmed whether or not the order exists.

Apple said only that it was “gravely disappointed” that it would no longer be able to offer ADP in the UK.

“Apple remains committed to offering our users the highest level of security for their personal data, and are hopeful that we will be able to do so in the future in the United Kingdom,” it said in a statement. “As we have said many times before, we have never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services and we never will.”

Apple’s ADP feature lets users encrypt their personal data when it is stored online on the company’s servers. It means that when files such as photos or messages are backed up, not even Apple is able to see them, despite hosting them.

Like all of Apple’s encryption tools, that feature has led to criticism from intelligence agencies and others, who argue that it stops them from accessing the data of those engaged in criminal activity.

But experts have warned that the original order, and now Apple’s decision to withdraw the feature, will put users in danger.

Dray Agha, senior manager of security operations at cybersecurity firm Huntress, said: “Apple’s decision to pull Advanced Data Protection in the UK is a direct response to increasing government demands for access to encrypted user data.

“Weakening encryption not only makes UK users more vulnerable to cyber threats but also sets a dangerous precedent for global privacy. Governments argue this helps law enforcement, but history shows that any backdoor created for one party can eventually be exploited by bad actors.

“The broader concern is that this move could pressure other companies to weaken their security, putting personal data worldwide at greater risk.”

Privacy campaigners said that the effects of the decision would echo more broadly.

“This decision by Apple is the regrettable consequence of the Home Office’s outrageous order attempting to force Apple to breach encryption. As a result, from today Apple’s UK customers are less safe and secure than they were yesterday – and this will quickly prove to have much wider implications for internet users in the UK,” said Rebecca Vincent of privacy and civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch.

“No matter how this is framed, there is simply no such thing as a ‘back door’ that can be limited only to criminals or that can be kept safe from hackers or foreign adversaries. Once encryption is broken for anyone, it’s broken for everyone, and as we have cautioned, this will not stop with Apple.

“We once again call on the Home Office to immediately rescind this draconian order, and cease attempts to break encryption, before the privacy rights of millions are eroded and the UK further ostracises itself from other democracies around the world.”


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
Kanye Names His Personal Picks for Hip-Hop’s Mount Rushmore

Kanye Names His Personal Picks for Hip-Hop’s Mount Rushmore

Kanye West’s career has been shaped as much by shifting relationships as by music. His collaborations have produced landmark albums, but his public breaks with figures like Jay-Z and Pusha T have also become part of his story. Now, a recently surfaced extended interview offers another glimpse into how he sees the current rap landscape. The footage, from a conversation with Justin Laboy on The Download, first aired last year but has reemerged online in a longer cut. During the interview, Laboy


O A

“Costs from Trump's tariffs paid almost entirely by US consumers”, NY Fed says

“Costs from Trump's tariffs paid almost entirely by US consumers”, NY Fed says

As President Donald Trump changed tariff agreements with a number of countries, there was one constant: goods became more expensive for US companies and consumers. In research released Thursday by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, a group of analysts and economists found that in 2025, the average tariff rate on imported goods rose to 13% from just 2.6% at the start of the year. The New York Fed found that 90% of the cost of increased tariffs, which Trump imposed on goods from Mexico, China


O A

How Ray Turned Super Bowl Weekend Into His Own Co‑Hosted Show

How Ray Turned Super Bowl Weekend Into His Own Co‑Hosted Show

Ray isn’t in the booth calling the game, but he and Tota have basically turned Super Bowl weekend into a live‑streamed crossover episode for their communities. Instead of a blazer and a studio desk, his “set” is the Fanatics red carpet and the NFL’s celebrity flag football field, where they stream for hours, bouncing between events, reading chat and grabbing whoever wanders past for off‑the‑cuff interviews. Clips from Vegas show Ray doing a goofy NFL “check‑in” segment, reuniting with Tota on t


B P

Lieu Presses Bondi on Epstein Files and Alleged Trump Assault in Fiery House Hearing

Lieu Presses Bondi on Epstein Files and Alleged Trump Assault in Fiery House Hearing

Rep. Ted Lieu used this week’s House Judiciary oversight hearing to press Attorney General Pam Bondi on why the Justice Department has not prosecuted high‑profile men linked to Jeffrey Epstein, including former Prince Andrew and at least one witness’s allegation involving Donald Trump. In a tense exchange, Lieu said both Bondi and her predecessor Merrick Garland had “dropped the ball,” then accused her of lying under oath after she testified there was “no evidence” Trump committed a crime, citi


B P