Apple Pulls Key iPhone Security Feature Amid UK Government Pressure
#image_title

Apple Pulls Key iPhone Security Feature Amid UK Government Pressure


Share this post

Apple has removed security features from iPhones in the UK, in response to demands from the government to be given access to user data.

The tech giant is removing its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) system, which encrypts user files uploaded to the cloud.

It comes after reports that the British government issued Apple with a order under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 to provide “back door” access to its devices, which would allow intelligence agencies to spy on users.

Neither Apple nor the Home Office has confirmed whether or not the order exists.

Apple said only that it was “gravely disappointed” that it would no longer be able to offer ADP in the UK.

“Apple remains committed to offering our users the highest level of security for their personal data, and are hopeful that we will be able to do so in the future in the United Kingdom,” it said in a statement. “As we have said many times before, we have never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services and we never will.”

Apple’s ADP feature lets users encrypt their personal data when it is stored online on the company’s servers. It means that when files such as photos or messages are backed up, not even Apple is able to see them, despite hosting them.

Like all of Apple’s encryption tools, that feature has led to criticism from intelligence agencies and others, who argue that it stops them from accessing the data of those engaged in criminal activity.

But experts have warned that the original order, and now Apple’s decision to withdraw the feature, will put users in danger.

Dray Agha, senior manager of security operations at cybersecurity firm Huntress, said: “Apple’s decision to pull Advanced Data Protection in the UK is a direct response to increasing government demands for access to encrypted user data.

“Weakening encryption not only makes UK users more vulnerable to cyber threats but also sets a dangerous precedent for global privacy. Governments argue this helps law enforcement, but history shows that any backdoor created for one party can eventually be exploited by bad actors.

“The broader concern is that this move could pressure other companies to weaken their security, putting personal data worldwide at greater risk.”

Privacy campaigners said that the effects of the decision would echo more broadly.

“This decision by Apple is the regrettable consequence of the Home Office’s outrageous order attempting to force Apple to breach encryption. As a result, from today Apple’s UK customers are less safe and secure than they were yesterday – and this will quickly prove to have much wider implications for internet users in the UK,” said Rebecca Vincent of privacy and civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch.

“No matter how this is framed, there is simply no such thing as a ‘back door’ that can be limited only to criminals or that can be kept safe from hackers or foreign adversaries. Once encryption is broken for anyone, it’s broken for everyone, and as we have cautioned, this will not stop with Apple.

“We once again call on the Home Office to immediately rescind this draconian order, and cease attempts to break encryption, before the privacy rights of millions are eroded and the UK further ostracises itself from other democracies around the world.”


Share this post
Comments

Be the first to know

Join our community and get notified about upcoming stories

Subscribing...
You've been subscribed!
Something went wrong
Congress Split Over ICE After Minnesota Mother’s Killing During Deportation Stop

Congress Split Over ICE After Minnesota Mother’s Killing During Deportation Stop

Congress is locked in a fight over how to respond after an ICE officer shot and killed Minnesota mother Renee Nicole Good during a traffic stop tied to a deportation operation outside Minneapolis, as detailed in “Congress debating possible consequences for ICE after Renee Good’s death.” Lawmakers are weighing options that range from a full investigation and tighter rules on immigration raids to potential cuts to ICE funding and even impeachment proceedings against Homeland Security Secretary Kri


B P

Damson Idris Linked to Black Panther Return in Marvel’s MCU

Damson Idris Linked to Black Panther Return in Marvel’s MCU

A new rumor about the status of the future of Black Panther in the MCU hints that a new actor could be filming for multiple movies in the near future.  What is the latest Black Panther rumor?  According to a new rumor from insider Louai Turkmani, as well as The Geeky Cast podcast, Snowfall actor Damson Idris has been at Nashville, Tennessee’s Pinewood Studios, and will be “spending a lot of time” there, as he is reportedly set to film parts for various movies as the new Black Panther. View


O A

Trump Rejects Diddy’s Parole Plea Despite Personal Letter

Trump Rejects Diddy’s Parole Plea Despite Personal Letter

Sean “Diddy” Combs has formally petitioned President Donald Trump for clemency through a written letter, The New York Times reports. In a recent two-hour interview, Trump confirmed he received the correspondence. However, he indicated he does not intend to grant the pardon. While rumors of such a request had circulated, Thursday’s acknowledgment marks the first official confirmation. Diddy, 56, is currently serving a 50-month sentence related to prostitution charges. The appeal has sparked publ


O A

Stefon Diggs’ Arraignment Postponed Until After Super Bowl

Stefon Diggs’ Arraignment Postponed Until After Super Bowl

TMZ reports that Stefon Diggs won’t be heading into a courtroom until the playoff season is done. Per court documents, Diggs’ attorney argued that the football player was unable to make his initial arraignment on Jan.23, because of a “previously-scheduled professional commitment.”According to the outlet, the New England Patriots star’s court date has been pushed back until Feb.13, nearly a week after the 2026 Super Bowl.  The football player is currently facing “felony strangulation or suffocat


O A